International relations - contemporary global security Essay

International dealings - contemporary global security - endeavor ExampleSocial constructivism may be a helpful tool in studying foreign traffic. The discussion will be based on the thesis developed by Alexander Wendt riot s what the state makes of it. International relation theory is basically material. Social constructivism brings in a accessible zest to theory of international relation. This research paper considers affable constructivism as a perfect alternate for neorealist theory widely applied for international relations. Materialist theory analyzes behavior of states on the basis of material as influences distribution. A balanced relation amid states is usually measured by distribution of material power. It is relevant to note, that social constructivists reject this narrow approach to summary of the states power (Social constructivism). From the perspective of social constructivism, a social typeface of international relations is of crucial importance. This point o f view fag end be explained as follows politics and family is developed under the influence of human consciousness (Social constructivism). Moreover, international system doesnt exist separately. on that point be a lot of external and internal factors influencing on the global system development. Therefore, making analysis of global relations basing on a material basis is a narrow approach and there is a need to apply another theory that is more complex and socially-oriented. Anthropocentric context of the sophisticated worlds development coincides with the ideas of Wendt, whose claim is discussed further on. Basic claims of social constructivism and neorealism applied for international relations The international society exists among people and thus is influenced by peoples ideas and not just by material assets. The system represents the result of human mental activity. As it is explained, the international system is a set of ideas, a body of thought, a system of norms, which has been arranged by certain people at a particular time and place, a human invention or creation not of a fleshly or material kind but of a purely intellectual and ideational kind (Social constructivism). In this paradigm, a claim made by Alexander Wendt anarchy is what states make of it (1992) may be interpret in a different manner for example, the system stability is questioned for sure. A constructivist theory of international relations should be considered in detail. For example, the main claim of constructivists is that it is possible to observe a correlation between neorealist perplexity and materialist nature of the theory. Thus, in accordance with the social constructivism, it is better to focus on thoughts and ideas to realize the core stub of theory about anarchy and power balancing (Wendt, 1992). The difference between neorealism and constructivism provoke be seen in the following explanation of anarchy from these two different perspectives thus constructivists cla im that structures (i.e., factors and regulations which direct social actions) cant give explanation to the actors mechanical activities and neorealists state that the structure of anarchy is oppressing for the state actors (Fierke at al, 2001). Thus, we can see that both theories are focused on discussion about interrelation between actors and structures (Booth, 2005). Structures are actors constraints, but constructivists claim that structures can act in such a way that structures would be modify in new directions. Therefore, there is a need to refer to structuration which provides with a more flexible imaging of structure and actors interrelation (Wendt, 1992). If to apply structural constructivism to international relation theory it will be distinctly seen that anarchy should be considered in a less rigid manner. Power and interests of the state are not material factors, but rather are objective entities (Wendt, 1992). Moreover, Wendt claims that anarchy doesnt lead to self-h elp. The interaction between states is a decisive factor of the